Does U.S. Government Face Prospective LIABILITY For Vaping Deaths?


The death (and illness) toll continues to rise.

As of the most current update from the CDC, 47 U.S. vaping-connected deaths have now been confirmed, with two,290 instances of “associated lung injury reported”. Just about all of these deaths/illnesses have been attributed to black industry cannabis and tobacco vaping devices.

The CDC has identified vitamin E acetate as a suspected result in of these deaths and illnesses. Vitamin E acetate is banned from legal vaping items.

When the U.S. government abandoned its disastrous experiment with alcohol Prohibition, one particular of the primary motives for carrying out so was to shield U.S. alcohol buyers from deaths and injuries from black industry alcohol – moonshine.

But when it comes to cannabis buyers?

Nero continues to fiddle even though Rome burns.

Right here investors want to recognize that governments are not immune from the consequences of their personal reckless behavior.

Whilst the U.S. government has common immunity from legal liability (for mere negligence), there is an in depth statutory list of “exceptions” to this immunity from liability.

When the “vaping crisis” initially arose, the U.S. federal government was exposed as becoming negligent. Had cannabis currently been federally legalized and regulated, arguably none of these deaths/illnesses would have occurred. At worst, casualty figures would have been slashed.

There are now mountains of empirical proof that there was never ever any health-related or legal justification for criminalizing cannabis. Conversely, as cannabis has been legalized – piecemeal – across the United States, cities and states have knowledgeable only constructive rewards from legalization.

In quick, there is no legal excuse for the U.S. government (or any other government) in continuing to criminalize cannabis.

As much more and much more Americans sicken and die from black industry vaping items, the U.S. federal government is refusing to address its personal negligence. And it has no reputable excuse of any type for this omission.

This escalates the culpability of the federal government from mere negligence to recklessness: selecting to ignore the apparent danger to U.S. buyers.

Arguably, this currently meets the threshold essential for U.S. courts to contemplate waiving U.S. sovereign immunity. And U.S. lawyers are beginning to take note.

A new short article in Insurance coverage Journal is revealing.

Vape Crisis Prompts Calls for Higher Clarity in Cannabis Regulation

Cannabis market lawyers are calling for higher clarity about regulation of the cannabis market.

Panelists at the 2019 Expert Liability Underwriting Society (PLUS) Conference in Washington D.C. this month mentioned the ongoing vape crisis in distinct highlights the want for greater regulation.

“I feel the [cannabis] market is saying to the federal government, ‘Look, the time of the federal government’s only policy response to marijuana becoming criminal enforcement is more than,’” mentioned Ian Stewart, co-chair of Wilson Elser’s Cannabis Law practice. “This is now a public well being crisis, individuals are dying since it is not regulated.” [emphasis mine]

If federal politicians and regulators have been to pull their heads out of their asses lengthy sufficient to appear about, they may perceive this as a threat.

Your time is up. This is now a public well being crisis. Men and women are dying since cannabis is not legal and regulated.

A clear causal connection has been established amongst this political failure (at the federal level) and the increasing death toll amongst the American individuals.

What is becoming accomplished in Washington? Practically nothing at all.

The Property just voted on what Democrat’s are calling marijuana legalization”. It is not.

It is mere decriminalization. This (partisan) bill has zero opportunity of becoming passed. Decriminalization does nothing at all at all to shield Americans from tainted black industry vaping items. Mere decriminalization essentially tends to make it much easier for the cannabis black industry to operate.

The U.S. government is now refusing to address its personal recklessness on the vaping crisis. The NY Occasions has currently described this well being threat as “an epidemic”.

What comes (legally) following recklessness? Malice.

In this context, legal malice would be defined as “a callous disregard for human life” on the portion of the U.S. federal government: ignoring the loss of American lives since it just does not care.

Currently, cannabis lawyers are beginning to fire salvos in the path of the U.S. federal government.

Tomorrow? If at any point, litigation lawyers perceive the federal government as becoming malicious in its refusal to legalize and regulate cannabis nationally, the lawyers will be lining up to file suit against the United States government.




Latest posts