It is been two years given that the Sacramento City Auditor produced 20 suggestions to boost the city’s oversight of the cannabis market, but some have not been totally implemented. 

According to the auditor’s workplace, the city has totally-implemented 16 of 20  suggestions from 2017 that have been produced immediately after a number of challenges with cannabis dispensaries have been uncovered.

The city has only “partly implemented” a strategy to obtain out why dispensaries failed to create requested economic and membership information at the time of the audit and only partly implemented a strategy to have a lot more audits of the market carried out by an independent firm. 

Also, the city has began but not implemented a plan to determine “higher-threat” violations of city policy nor has it implemented a strategy to execute testing to determine dispensaries that fail to appropriately report their gross receipts. 

Preceding holes in the method permitted 1 man to have an interest in eight of the 30 dispensaries in the city according to the Sacramento Bee.  He has ties to a group of Ukrainian guys charged with federal conspiracy and campaign finance violations.   

Mayor Darrell Steinberg has been on the job as healthcare marijuana dispensaries produced the transition to recreational pot shops. 

“I want to ask for our manager and city lawyer to come back to council urgently with suggestions to at minimum temporarily prohibit ownership transfers of our cannabis dispensaries although we audit and examine our processes,” Steinberg mentioned at final week’s city council meeting.

City Auditor Jorge Oseguera says his workplace will prepare an updated critique of the city’s progress and present findings to the council quickly. He says the permits are not supposed to be sold, but members can be added if they pass a background verify. 

“There is not genuinely a great mechanism to monitor that. So they have to be sincere, up front. We’re dependant on them to come forward with that facts. It is not like you have shares and the city knows who has shares of this distinct collective,” Oseguera mentioned.

The city may possibly not actively track owners, but Malaki Amen of the California Urban Partnership says his group’s critique shows black individuals have been left out of ownership possibilities. 

“Not 1 of the marijuana dispensaries has ownership by individuals who have qualifications for the city’s equity plan,” Amen mentioned. “Not 1 of them come from a zip code exactly where there was poverty primarily based on disproportionate arrests for marijuana.”